Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Targeted LC-MS/MS profiling of serum amino acids reveals type 2 diabetes-specific alterations in advanced gastric cancer.

Created on 17 Jun 2026

Authors

Mehmet Emrah Yaman, Omer Faruk Kocak, Omer Topdagi, Yucel Kadioglu

Published in

Bioanalysis. Pages 1-13. Jun 17, 2026. Epub Jun 17, 2026.

Abstract

Altered amino acid metabolism is a feature of gastric cancer. Type 2 diabetes (T2D), a prevalent metabolic comorbidity, may affect circulating amino acid profiles; this study aimed to quantify its impact.
A validated targeted LC-MS/MS assay profiled 22 serum amino acids in 156 participants, including gastric cancer patients with and without type 2 diabetes and controls.
Adjusted models showed that many observed differences were attributable to type 2 diabetes and body mass index. Type 2 diabetes was associated with lower ornithine (β =  -1.16; q = 0.0019) and interacted with gastric cancer for arginine (β_int =  -1.10; q = 0.0044) and phenylalanine (β_int =  +1.05; q = 0.0112). After adjustment, only valine, taurine, and total amino acids remained lower in gastric cancer. Body mass index was inversely associated with glutamine and positively associated with glutamate.
Covariate-adjusted analysis distinguishes cancer-related from comorbidity-driven alterations and identifies type 2 diabetes as a key modifier of amino acid metabolism. Metabolic covariates should be considered when interpreting amino acid alterations in advanced gastric cancer biomarker studies. However, the findings should be interpreted in light of the predominantly advanced-stage gastric cancer cohort and require validation in larger prospective studies.

PMID:
42307968
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 17 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement