Reconciling the Literature on Sex-Based Disparities in Reimbursement.

Authors

Asha B McClurg, Louise P King, Christopher Robertson

Published in

Obstetrics and gynecology. Volume 148. Issue 1. Pages e54-e58. Jul 01, 2026. Epub Apr 16, 2026.

Abstract

Significant disparities in surgical reimbursement by patient sex have been documented for decades, although debate exists regarding their cause, and studies have approached the issue with different methodologies, arriving at seemingly divergent conclusions. In our analysis, we have found that the preponderance of the literature, including the most comprehensive studies, supports a conclusion that there are real payment disparities at the work relative value unit (RVU) level for gynecologic care. Disparities in funding and reimbursement result in differing health care resource allocation and access and ultimately systemic and persistent devaluation of female bodies. We advocate for robust interventions to promote equity rather than a limited approach focused on revising a handful of Current Procedural Terminology codes. Reforms should include broader RVU reassessment, specialty compensation parity, and rigorous yet inclusive comparisons of sex-specific procedures.

PMID:
42314199
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.