Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Promoter methylation-associated brain-enriched long noncoding RNAs in glioblastoma: a multi-cohort public epigenomic re-analysis.

Created on 19 Jun 2026

Authors

Ye Tan, Fengyu Cheng, Pu Li, Jingxuan Xiang, Yuhong Tang, Aidong Chen, Peiying Han

Published in

Epigenomics. Pages 1-10. Jun 19, 2026. Epub Jun 19, 2026.

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is epigenetically heterogeneous, and previous long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) methylation studies have often begun from tumor-wide screens. We asked whether brain-enriched lncRNAs show promoter methylation-associated suppression in GBM.
Brain-enriched lncRNAs were defined using GENCODE v49 and GTEx/UCSC Xena. Primary discovery used TCGA-GBM primary tumors with matched expression and promoter methylation; 52 patients had both data types. Spearman correlations identified methylation-associated candidates (ρ ≤-0.30; false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.05). External layers used GSE36278 methylation, CGGA expression/survival, and GSE131928 Smart-seq2 state scores.
Of 13,213 lncRNAs, 437 were brain-enriched and 76 entered matched TCGA analysis; seven met core criteria. PTPRD-AS1 and NFIB-AS1 showed the strongest inverse coupling (ρ = -0.665 and -0.639; FDR = 0.000016 and 0.000028). GSE36278 supported hypermethylation direction for all seven candidates, with six FDR-significant. MEG8 and FAM201A were downregulated in CGGA versus GTEx brain, and FAM201A associated with pseudobulk stemness and mesenchymal scores.
This public-data re-analysis prioritizes brain-enriched lncRNAs associated with promoter hypermethylation and lower expression in GBM, but does not establish direct methylation-mediated silencing.

PMID:
42318604
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 19 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement