Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Multi-institutional international investigation of VMAT treatment planning techniques for breast cancer with regional lymph nodes.

Created on 20 Jun 2026

Authors

Maria Jäckel, Alessandro Clivio, E Ambroa Rey, Paul Doolan, Damien Dumont, Marion Essers, Maria Trinitat García Hernández, Diego Gaudino, María Lizondo, Ebbe Laugaard Lorenzen, Mikko Mankinen, Maria Luisa Martin Albina, M Martínez Albaladejo, Caroline Moreau-Noblet, Anna Negri, Vaclav Novak, Luca Pellegri, Sara Poeta, Igor Prokofev, Izabela Pytko, David Sánchez-Artuñedo, Alain Sottiaux, Karin Uttman, Keith Walsh, Tuomas Koivumäki

Published in

Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics (AIFB). Volume 148. Pages 105844. Jun 19, 2026. Epub Jun 19, 2026.

Abstract

Despite constant developments in radiotherapy, optimizing Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) dose distributions for whole breast with extensive lymph node involvement remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to gain insights into clinical practices and to identify effective planning strategies.
The participants of the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics VMAT Breast Working Group answered a survey regarding treatment planning routines for breast cancer irradiation and generated a treatment plan for a challenging patient case. The dose prescription was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions for breast and lymph node volumes, and a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of 63 Gy.
The survey was completed by 25 participants and covered a wide spectrum of topics of VMAT treatment planning, including beam geometry and organs at risk (OAR) dose constraints. In addition, 22 plans were submitted for comparison. The mean doses ranged between: PTV breast 51.9---54.1 Gy, PTV lymph nodes 49.7---52.1 Gy, SIB 61.5---66.5 Gy, heart 1.5---9.5 Gy, ipsilateral lung 12.0---17.3 Gy, contralateral lung 1.2---6.5 Gy and contralateral breast 1.6---8.9 Gy. Five treatment planning strategies, with high target coverage and the lowest doses to organs at risk, are presented.
There is a wide variation in VMAT breast planning approaches, planning goals and prioritisation of PTVs and OARs across institutions. Descriptions of effective planning strategies for a challenging breast case are presented.

PMID:
42320191
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement