Nitrogen loss response to stacked, accretive conservation practices: A 10-year paired watershed study.

Authors

Shoaib Ahmed, Richa Babbar, Leigh Ann Long, Ji Yeow Law, Michelle L Soupir

Published in

Journal of environmental management. Volume 412. Pages 130207. Jun 19, 2026. Epub Jun 19, 2026.

Abstract

Tile-drained row-crop watersheds are efficient at moving water, and that same efficiency can move nitrate out of fields and into downstream waters. To evaluate nitrogen export patterns associated with stacked conservation practices over time, 10 years (2015-2024) of monitoring data during the March-November monitoring season was analyzed. Study sites included two paired sub-watersheds, S11 (low BMP) and S12 (high BMP) of the Black Hawk Lake watershed. Flow-weighted baseflow and event samples were collected and analyzed for NO₃-N, total ammoniacal nitrogen (TAN), and total nitrogen (TN). Concentrations and loads were compared using nonparametric tests and effect sizes, and long-term and sub-period trends were evaluated using Seasonal Mann-Kendall and Innovative Trend Analysis approaches, which are commonly applied to non-normal environmental time series. Across the monitoring period, NO₃-N was consistently higher in S11 than S12 (mean NO₃-N: 27.0 vs 10.9 mg N/L), and NO₃-N unit loads were about threefold higher in S11 (1.20 vs 0.39 kg N d^-1 ha^-1). Throughout the monitoring period, the high-BMP watershed exhibited a decline in NO₃-N and TN export (70.5% and 54.2%), while S11 showed smaller reductions and an increasing trend after 2019 consistent with a drought-rewetting N flush. Overall, the contrasting trajectories between the paired watersheds suggest that greater and more consistent conservation-practice implementation was associated with lower nitrate export and improved long-term water quality outcomes, although differences in manure inputs, and source availability limit direct causal attribution.

PMID:
42320211
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.