Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Development of a Healthy Aging Index and Analysis of Healthy Aging Trajectories Over a 6-Year Period Using the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study.

Created on 20 Jun 2026

Authors

Eunsaem Kim, Yunhwan Lee, Jinhee Kim, Miji Kim, Younyoung Choi, Jimin Han

Published in

The Gerontologist. Jun 19, 2026. Epub Jun 19, 2026.

Abstract

Measurements and data on older adults are instrumental in our understanding of healthy aging (HA). No universally agreed-upon definition and heterogeneity in the operationalization of HA have necessitated the development of better HA measures. This study aimed to develop a Healthy Aging Index (HAI) based on a multidimensional item response theory (MIRT) framework and explore patterns of HA trajectories over a six-year period with adverse health outcomes as distal outcomes.
Using longitudinal data (baseline to Wave 4, n = 2,986) from the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study, factor analyses and a bifactor MIRT model were used to evaluate the psychometric properties. Heterogeneity in HA trajectories, with mortality and frailty as distal outcomes, was investigated using a growth-mixture model.
The 25-item multidimensional HAI demonstrated an excellent model fit (RMSEA = 0.023, TLI = 0.979, CFI = 0.983). We identified four subgroups that exhibited similar HA trajectory patterns. Notably, compared with those in the high-stable group (57.6%), the moderate-stable (29.7%) and low-declining (4%) groups were associated with an increased risk of mortality (Odds Ratios [OR] = 2.60 and 4.55) and frailty (OR = 6.41 and 40.00) at Wave 4. The high decliners (8.7%) were more likely to be frail and exhibit worse physical function than the high-stable group over the six-year follow-up period.
A multidimensional measure of HA may help identify older adults who are at risk of early mortality and frailty.

PMID:
42319896
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement