Validation of MRI-based nnU-Net model for automated segmentation of neck lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter study.

Authors

Chaofan Sui, Xiaoxia Qu, Ning Xu, Xiao Wang, Hanjuan Zhang, Xinyan Wang, Pengfei Zhao, Junfang Xian

Published in

Neuroradiology. Jun 20, 2026. Epub Jun 20, 2026.

Abstract

To develop and externally validate an MRI-based deep learning framework for automated 3D segmentation of neck lymph nodes (LNs) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), and to assess segmentation accuracy, volumetric agreement, and time efficiency.
Axial head and neck MRI data were retrospectively collected from two centers. Each LN was manually delineated following two strategies: margin-excluding approach (excluding a 1-2 mm perinodal margin) and boundary-adherent approach (following the LN contour). For each strategy, nnU-Net (a DL framework) was applied for training three single-sequence models using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1w), T1-weighted (T1w), and T2-weighted (T2w) imaging. The model performance was evaluated in the internal validation cohort (n = 99) and the external test cohort (n = 150). Efficiency was assessed by comparing manual vs. DL-assisted contouring times in a separate cohort (n = 851).
In the internal validation cohort, the model trained on CE-T1w images with boundary-adherent annotations achieved the highest overlap (median Dice similarity coefficient of 0.795). CE-T1w model showed high volumetric agreement with manual segmentation (concordance correlation coefficient of 0.939 for margin-excluding and 0.899 for boundary-adherent strategies), and its performance was confirmed in the external test cohort. DL assistance reduced contouring time by 33.14% (n = 851, mean 100.22 s vs. 149.89 s, p < 0.001). The two annotation policies yielded similar LN counts but significantly different volume endpoints (p < 0.001).
We developed and validated a deep learning framework capable of accurate and efficient 3D LN segmentation using single-sequence model inputs after CE-T1w-referenced preprocessing. The model shows strong generalization across multiple centers. This tool can standardize volumetric assessments and improve clinical workflow efficiency in HNSCC.

PMID:
42321574
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.