Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Benchmarking deep learning models for laryngeal cancer staging using the LaryngealCT dataset.

Created on 20 Jun 2026

Authors

Nivea Roy, Son N Tran, Atul Sajjanhar, K Devaraja, Prakashini Koteshwara, Yong Xiang, Divya Rao

Published in

Scientific reports. Jun 19, 2026. Epub Jun 19, 2026.

Abstract

Laryngeal cancer imaging research lacks standardised public datasets to enable reproducible deep learning (DL) model development. We present LaryngealCT, a curated benchmark of 1,029 computed tomography (CT) scans aggregated from six collections from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). Uniform 1 mm isotropic volumes of interest encompassing the larynx were extracted using a weakly supervised parameter search framework validated by clinical experts. Six 3D DL architectures (custom 3D CNN, ResNet18/50/101, DenseNet121 and MedicalNet-pretrained ResNet50) were benchmarked on (i) early (Tis-T2) vs. advanced (T3-T4) and (ii) T4 vs. non-T4 classification tasks. On the independent test set, the 3D CNN achieved the strongest overall performance across global and per-class metrics (Accuracy = 0.854, F1-macro = 0.841) in early vs. advanced classification. In the T4 task, AU-ROC values exceeded 0.82 for most models, but sensitivity for T4 disease remained limited (≤ 0.412), with ResNet101 showing the most promising calibrated T4 recall (0.706). Model explainability assessed using GradCAM ++ with thyroid cartilage overlays for the T4 classification task revealed anatomically plausible peri-cartilage activations although spatial overlap remained modest. Through open-source data, pretrained models, and integrated explainability tools, LaryngealCT offers a reproducible foundation for AI-driven research to support future clinical decision-making in laryngeal oncology.

PMID:
42321364
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement