Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Social psychological dimensions of physical activity: a state-of-the-art review of reviews.

Created on 20 Jun 2026

Authors

Ryan E Rhodes, Kyra McKinnon, Joe Barton, Mark R Beauchamp

Published in

Health psychology review. Pages 1-23. Jun 20, 2026. Epub Jun 20, 2026.

Abstract

The purpose of this state-of-the-art review of reviews was to unify, describe and appraise the relationship between physical activity (PA) and social psychological constructs, using the social dimensions of health behavior (SDHB) framework, which represents a taxonomy of 10 social dimensions applicable to health behaviors. Eligible reviews were published in a peer-reviewed journal in English, included a review in which PA was operationalized as a focal predictor or outcome variable and with data also reported on at least one social construct reported in the results, and published between 2010 and July 2025. Literature searches were completed in August 2025 using seven common databases. The search yielded 54 reviews. We identified limited evidence for reviews of experimental research. Reviews of observational quantitative studies showed associations between PA with injunctive norm, perceived social support, and attachment ties with meta-analysis point estimates in the small, positive effect size range. Reviews of qualitative studies revealed positive associations with PA that covered the entire SDHB framework, yet most were conducted on specific populations so generalizability was not clear. The findings show domains in need of further examination to address gaps in knowledge, opportunities for theoretical integration, and highlight key social dimensions important in PA promotion.

PMID:
42322154
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement