Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Chronotype and bedtime procrastination: The role of problematic generative artificial intelligence use and gender.

Created on 20 Jun 2026

Authors

Kağan Kırcaburun, Hasan Çalışkan

Published in

Chronobiology international. Pages 1-12. Jun 19, 2026. Epub Jun 19, 2026.

Abstract

Individual differences in circadian preference have been increasingly linked to maladaptive technology-related behaviors; however, their role in problematic generative artificial intelligence use (PGAIU) remains underexplored. Moreover, while the negative outcomes of PGAIU have received growing attention, its potential adverse effects on sleep-related variables remain insufficiently understood. The present study examined the associations among morningness-eveningness, PGAIU, and bedtime procrastination, as well as potential gender differences in these relationships. Data were collected from 410 adult generative artificial intelligence (GAI) users via an online survey (51.5% women; Mage = 41.27). Structural equation modeling indicated that higher morningness was consistently associated with lower levels of bedtime procrastination in the total sample as well as among both men and women. Morningness was positively and significantly related to PGAIU only among men, suggesting a gender-specific pattern in the chronotype-GAI use relationship. Furthermore, PGAIU was positively associated with bedtime procrastination in the total sample and among women, whereas this association was not significant among men. Although morningness and PGAIU were associated with bedtime procrastination, PGAIU did not emerge as a significant mediator between morningness and bedtime procrastination. Overall, the present study represents one of the first empirical investigations examining the associations between PGAIU and sleep-related variables, particularly bedtime procrastination, within a circadian framework.

PMID:
42322073
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 20 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement