Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Psychosocial adversity captured by ICD-10 Z-codes and mortality risk: evidence from the UK Biobank.

Created on 22 Jun 2026

Authors

May A Beydoun, Hind A Beydoun, Jack Tsai, Indira C Turney, Osorio Meirelles, Tianyi Huang, Nicole Noren Hooten, Lenore J Launer, Michele K Evans, Alan B Zonderman

Published in

GeroScience. Jun 20, 2026. Epub Jun 20, 2026.

Abstract

Psychosocial adversity is a major determinant of health, but the mortality associations of its clinical documentation via ICD-10 Z55-Z65 codes remain unclear. We conducted a matched cohort study of UK Biobank participants with linked Hospital Episode Statistics and mortality records. Participants with ≥ 1 ICD-10 Z55-Z65 code recorded between 2010 and 2020 were propensity score-matched (1:1) to hospitalized participants without Z-codes. Mortality follow-up occurred from 2020 to 2023. Associations with all-cause mortality were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, and cause-specific mortality using Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models accounting for competing risks. The matched cohort included 13,604 participants (6802 with Z-codes and 6802 without). During a mean follow-up of 3.75 years, mortality rates were 50.8 versus 22.9 deaths per 1000 person-years among participants with and without Z-codes, respectively. Z-code documentation was associated with higher all-cause mortality (HR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.82, 2.23). Elevated risks were observed across major causes of death, with the strongest association for housing and economic hardship (Z59). Hospital documentation of psychosocial adversity (ICD-10 Z55-Z65 codes) was associated with substantially higher mortality and may contribute to population health surveillance when integrated into electronic health records.

PMID:
42322547
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement