Clinical Skill Anxiety and Its Determinants Among Clinical-Year Health Science Students in Ethiopia: An Institutional-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors

Habtie Bantider Wubet, Elelta Mulugeta Ayalew, Temesgen Birlie Asmare, Diriba Teshome, Basazinew Chekol Demilew, Tiruwork Desse Tamir, Metages Hunie Belay, Kaletsidk Dessalegn Mossie, Samuel Fasika Demissie, Negesse Zurbachew Gobezie

Published in

Nursing open. Volume 13. Issue 6. Pages e70645.

Abstract

Clinical skill anxiety (CSA) is a common psychological challenge among health science students during their clinical years, potentially impacting clinical competence and patient safety. While previous Ethiopian studies have highlighted high levels of stress and anxiety among students, evidence on context-specific CSA and its determinants among clinical-year students remains limited.
This institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted between 20 August and 25 October 2025. A total of 426 clinical-year health science students across medicine, nursing, midwifery, and anaesthesia programs at Debre Tabor Comprehensive Specialized Hospital (DTCSH) were invited to participate in a census. The study assessed clinical skill anxiety (CSA) and associated characteristics using an adapted Clinical Skill Anxiety Scale (CSAS). This scale was informed by established instruments (STAI, BAI, and PSS), modified through a literature review and expert consultation, and demonstrated acceptable internal consistency in this study population (Cronbach's α = 0.86). Predictors of CSA were identified using multivariable logistic regression (p < 0.05; 95% CI).
The overall prevalence of CSA among clinical-year health science students was 64.2% (95% CI: 59.5%-69.0%). Significant determinants included fear of making mistakes (AOR = 4.2; 95% CI: 2.80-6.30), limited instructor feedback (AOR = 3.6; 95% CI: 2.05-6.32), female sex (AOR = 2.2; 95% CI: 1.62-2.98), lack of prior clinical-skills exposure (AOR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.35-3.26), and high academic stress (AOR = 1.8; 95% CI: 1.25-2.60).
Nearly two-thirds (64.2%) of clinical-year students experienced CSA, which was associated with psychological, institutional, and instructional factors. Based on these cross-sectional findings, we suggest that strengthening mentorship, feedback systems, simulated skill practice, and stress-reduction strategies may be beneficial. Future research could explore interventions such as maintaining lower student-to-instructor ratios, bolstering structured feedback systems, increasing simulation-based learning opportunities, and integrating resilience training into health science courses. However, causal inferences cannot be drawn from this cross-sectional design; therefore, intervention studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches.
No patients, caregivers, or public members participated in this study; the research focused exclusively on health science students in Ethiopia.

PMID:
42324701
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.