Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Selective Inhibition of KRASG13C Reveals an Increased Dependence on Wild-Type RAS Isoforms in Codon 13 RAS-Mutant Cancers.

Created on 22 Jun 2026

Authors

Kyle J Seamon, Yongxian Zhuang, Yu Chi Yang, Sujata Chakraborty, James Cregg, Aidan C A Tomlinson, Andrea Gould, Ethan Ahler, Benjamin J Maldonato, Jessica N Spradlin, Kristof Pota, Caroline Weller, Abby Marquez, Zhican Wang, Elena S Koltun, John E Knox, Adrian L Gill, Jacqueline A M Smith, Mallika Singh, Jingjing Jiang, David Wildes, Matthew Holderfield

Published in

Cancer discovery. Jun 22, 2026. Epub Jun 22, 2026.

Abstract

Covalent KRAS G12C inhibitors have changed the treatment landscape for NSCLC and CRC patients, but numerous RAS-mutant cancers lack approved targeted therapies. Here we describe RMC-8839, an oral RAS(ON) G13C-selective, covalent, tri-complex inhibitor that induced tumor regressions in selected KRAS G13C-mutant xenograft models. However, one-third of KRAS G13C-mutant human cancer cell lines in vitro showed incomplete RAS pathway suppression despite near-complete KRAS G13C engagement, suggesting a role for wild-type RAS(ON). We find that codon 13-mutant RAS differs from other KRAS mutations, exhibiting decreased stability, increased nucleotide exchange, and substantial intrinsic and GAP-stimulated GTP hydrolysis, which decreases oncogenicity. Furthermore, co-occurring RAS pathway mutations leading to increased wild-type RAS activation are enriched in codon 13 mutant tumors. Consistent with a role for wild-type RAS(ON) signaling, combination of RMC-8839 with a RAS(ON) multi-selective inhibitor resulted in deeper inhibition of KRAS G13C-mutant xenograft tumor growth than either inhibitor alone.

PMID:
42329095
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 22 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement