Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Cortical dynamics of icon perception: effects of concreteness and attractiveness.

Created on 23 Jun 2026

Authors

Jiaqi Zheng, Weiyong Xu, Johanna Silvennoinen, Fengyu Cong, Tiina Parviainen, Tuomo Kujala

Published in

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991). Volume 36. Issue 6. Jun 02, 2026.

Abstract

Icons, as simplified visual symbols, play a key role in visual communication, yet little neuroimaging research has addressed how icons are represented in the brain. We investigated how concreteness and attractiveness modulate the spatiotemporal dynamics of icon processing in a 2 × 2 factorial design in 35 adults using magnetoencephalography. Source-level event-related field (ERF) analysis and representational similarity analysis (RSA) were used to characterize neural responses, with partial RSA isolating each feature's unique contribution after controlling for low-level visual similarity. ERF results showed that concreteness exerted a robust and sustained influence on neural dynamics, with concrete icons eliciting stronger responses than abstract ones from 90 to 1,000 ms, emerging in bilateral occipital cortices and extending to occipitotemporal, temporal, and parietal regions. RSA confirmed concreteness as a representational dimension across processing stages. Attractiveness showed an early but transient effect in occipital and ventral occipitotemporal regions (80 to 130 ms), though this did not survive RSA after controlling for low-level visual property models. A concreteness × attractiveness interaction modulated early occipital and later parietal processing (100 to 185 ms), indicating these features do not operate independently. Our results reveal that semantic content outweighs esthetic appeal in shaping the neural representation of icons.

PMID:
42330320
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement