The contingent advantage of photosymbiosis in coral evolution.

Authors

Zhensheng Wei, Wolfgang Kiessling, Zhen Guo, Michael J Benton, Lewei Su, Yuangeng Huang, Zhong-Qiang Chen

Published in

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Volume 123. Issue 26. Pages e2532242123. Jun 30, 2026. Epub Jun 22, 2026.

Abstract

The ecological success of modern reef-building corals is rooted in photosymbiosis, yet its macroevolutionary benefit remains unclear. Analyzing the Phanerozoic record of inferred zooxanthellate (Z) and azooxanthellate (AZ) corals over geologic time scales using Bayesian methods, we identify a fundamental shift in diversification dynamics and their drivers across the Paleozoic-Mesozoic transition. Although Z corals dominate modern tropical reef ecosystems, their Paleozoic counterparts were outpaced by AZ forms and showed failed recoveries after the Late Devonian mass extinction. We found Z coral diversification was primarily driven by origination, whereas AZ diversification was controlled by extinction. Multivariate birth-death models reveal that Paleozoic coral diversification was governed by abiotic stressors like warming and anoxia, to which Z and AZ corals showed similar vulnerability. The rise of scleractinian corals in the Triassic marked a distinct macroevolutionary regime shift after which photosymbiosis spurred coral diversification. Positive correlations between temperature and Z coral extinction dominated the Paleozoic, while negative correlations prevailed in the Meso-Cenozoic. The long-term reversal of this relationship could be the reduced supersaturation of the oceans with respect to CaCO₃ due to the emergence of calcareous plankton in the Triassic. Our deep-time perspective demonstrates that the advantage of photosymbiosis is not intrinsic but contingent on the broader ecological and environmental context.

PMID:
42330276
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 23 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.