Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Top-down effects dominate the relationship between plant-herbivorous insect interactions and ecosystem stability.

Created on 24 Jun 2026

Authors

Yin Wang, Qianqian Qin, Jian Feng, Zijing Wang, Yuchen Zhang, Can Wang, Zhijun Yu, Jingze Liu

Published in

Nature ecology & evolution. Jun 23, 2026. Epub Jun 23, 2026.

Abstract

Consumptive interactions across trophic levels underpin ecosystem stability. Although theoretical and experimental studies have examined the diversity-stability relationship, empirical evidence linking trophic interactions to ecosystem stability remains limited. Here we evaluate how trophic interactions relate to stability across 430 plant-herbivorous insect networks from temperate and tropical ecosystems. We quantified interaction indicators alongside ecosystem resistance and resilience under drought and wet events. Higher plant diversity was associated with drought resistance but with reduced resilience, and these relationships weakened after accounting for sampling and environmental covariates. In contrast, drought resistance increased with network modularity, whereas resilience decreased with robustness, although these patterns were absent in temperate forests. Diversity and interaction indicators did not predict stability under wet events. Although both directions of trophic interaction-stability relationships were significant, the pathway from trophic interactions to stability (top-down) was stronger than the reverse. Our findings provide large-scale empirical evidence that top-down effects probably dominate the relationship between plant-herbivorous insect interactions and ecosystem stability under climate change.

PMID:
42337330
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement