Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Implementing trust in non-small cell lung cancer diagnosis with a conformalized uncertainty-aware AI framework.

Created on 24 Jun 2026

Authors

Xiaoge Zhang, Tao Wang, Chao Yan, Fedaa Najdawi, Kai Zhou, Yuan Ma, Yiu-Ming Cheung, Maximus C F Yeung, Bradley A Malin

Published in

Nature biomedical engineering. Jun 23, 2026. Epub Jun 23, 2026.

Abstract

Ensuring trustworthiness is fundamental in cancer diagnostics, where a misdiagnosis can have dire consequences. Current pathology AI models lack systematic solutions to address trustworthiness concerns arising from model limitations and data discrepancies between model deployment and development environments. Here we introduce TRUECAM (Trustworthiness-focused, Uncertainty-aware, End-to-end Cancer diagnosis with Model-agnostic capabilities), a framework designed to ensure both data and model trustworthiness for non-small cell lung cancer subtyping with whole-slide images. TRUECAM integrates (1) a spectral-normalized neural Gaussian process for identifying out-of-scope inputs, (2) an ambiguity-guided tile elimination to filter out highly ambiguous regions, addressing data trustworthiness, and (3) conformal prediction to ensure controlled error rates. We systematically evaluated TRUECAM across multiple cancer datasets using both task-specific and foundation models. Computational experiments suggest that models wrapped with TRUECAM consistently outperformed their unwrapped counterparts in classification accuracy, robustness, interpretability, data efficiency and fairness. These findings establish TRUECAM as a versatile framework for the responsible deployment of pathology AI in real-world settings.

PMID:
42337062
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement