Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Frequency of germline pathogenic variants in breast cancer predisposing genes in a national cohort of young women with breast cancer.

Created on 24 Jun 2026

Authors

Kelly Metcalfe, Steven A Narod, Aletta Poll, Christianne Hoey, Ellen Warner, Nancy N Baxter, Susan Isherwood, Ellen MacDougall, Neda Zemani, Flora Yang, Jason Samuel Suwito, May-Lynn Quan, Mohammad R Akbari, RUBY Study Group

Published in

British journal of cancer. Jun 23, 2026. Epub Jun 23, 2026.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the prevalence of pathogenic variants in 18 cancer predisposition genes in a national cohort of women with breast cancer diagnosed at age 40 or younger.
Women with breast cancer at age ≤40 years were recruited from 33 Canadian centres at diagnosis. Germline genetic testing was performed for 18 genes (ATM, BARD1, BRCA1, BRCA2, BRIP1, CDH1, CHEK2, PALB2, PTEN, STK11, RAD51D, RAD51C, EPCAM, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2). Prevalence of pathogenic variants (PVs) was estimated by age, family history and clinical characteristics.
In 805 women, 153 PVs were found (positivity rate 18.6%). Most PVs (63%) were found in BRCA1 (50) or BRCA2 (46). Other PVs were in CHEK2 (24), ATM (13), PALB2 (10), TP53 (5), BRIP1 (1), BARD1 (1), CDH1 (1) and PTEN (1). Higher PV frequencies were found in women with tumours with lobular histology (29.2%), triple negative cancers (27.5%), and bilateral breast cancers (35.7%).
Overall, 18.6% of women with young breast cancer had PVs in 18 genes tested, including 6.8% in a gene other than BRCA1 or BRCA2. Study results suggest that genetic testing should be offered to all women diagnosed breast cancer at the age of 40 or younger.

PMID:
42337046
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement