Cardiovascular events in patients with COPD after long-acting bronchodilator initiation.

Authors

Dave Singh, Ana R Sousa, David E Newby, Michele Jonsson Funk, Miguel Roman-Rodriguez, Peter Kardos, Gema Requena, Alison Donald, David Slade, Chris Compton

Published in

ERJ open research. Volume 12. Issue 3. Epub Jun 22, 2026.

Abstract

Real-world evidence concerning the cardiovascular (CV) risk of umeclidinium (UMEC) monotherapy or UMEC/vilanterol (VI) is scarce. This real-world study investigated CV risk in new users of UMEC or UMEC/VI versus new users of tiotropium (TIO) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
This prospective, observational, multinational, cohort study enrolled patients ≥18 years with COPD who initiated UMEC, UMEC/VI or TIO between 2 February 2016 and 31 January 2023. Noninferiority (95% confidence interval upper bound <2.0) of UMEC and UMEC/VI to TIO was compared for the time-to-first event (hazard ratio (HR) over 24 months) of a composite CV end-point of myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure or sudden cardiac death. Stabilised inverse probability of treatment weighting adjusted for differences in baseline covariate balance between groups. Incidence rates for the composite CV end-point were calculated.
In total, 6606 patients were enrolled; 6165 were included in the analysis. Both UMEC (n=1246) and UMEC/VI (n=2448) were noninferior to TIO (n=2471) for the risk of the composite CV end-point (adjusted HR (95% CI): UMEC versus TIO: 1.254 (0.830-1.896); UMEC/VI versus TIO: 1.352 (0.952-1.922)). Unadjusted composite CV incidence rates were low across cohorts (incidence rate (95% CI) per 100 person-years: UMEC: 1.157 (0.814-1.594); UMEC/VI: 1.287 (1.034-1.584); TIO: 0.924 (0.716-1.174)).
Both UMEC and UMEC/VI were noninferior to TIO for composite CV risk, suggesting that physicians may consider escalating patients to dual bronchodilator therapy if COPD symptoms are not effectively managed with monotherapy.

PMID:
42338673
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.