Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Impact of extended equilibration periods on in vitro post-thaw sperm quality in rams.

Created on 24 Jun 2026

Authors

Firat Korkmaz, Sukru Gungor, Muhammed Enes Inanc, Mine Herdogan, Hasan Ali Cay, Feyzanur Mart, Durmus Kahraman, Ufuk Kaya

Published in

Veterinary research communications. Volume 50. Issue 5. Jun 24, 2026. Epub Jun 24, 2026.

Abstract

Equilibration, a critical phase in cryopreservation, allows sperm cells to adapt to cryoprotective agents (CPAs) before freezing. This study investigated the impact of extended equilibration durations on the quality of frozen-thawed ram spermatozoa. Semen samples from five healthy Merino rams were pooled, extended with a Tris-based extender, and equilibrated for 3 h (control), 24, 48, or 72 h. post-equilibration and post-thaw sperm quality parameters, including motility, plasma membrane and acrosome integrity (PMAI), high mitochondrial membrane potential (HMMP), mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (MROS) levels, lipid peroxidation (LPO), and intracellular calcium levels (ICL) were analysed. Short equilibration durations (3-24 h) preserved motility, PMAI, and HMMP while minimizing MROS production, lipid peroxidation, and calcium influx. Conversely, prolonged equilibration (48-72 h) leads to CPA toxicity, oxidative stress, and premature capacitation-like changes, impairing sperm viability. Notably, 3-hour equilibration maintained post-thawed sperm with the highest motility (83.96 ± 1.87%) and lowest lipid peroxidation levels (11.46 ± 2.12%). These findings emphasize that shorter equilibration times optimize CPA penetration and minimize cryodamage, thereby enhancing post-thaw sperm function. These results provide valuable insights into refining cryopreservation protocols to improve freezing -thawing outcomes in ram sperm freezing centres.

PMID:
42340541
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement