Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Predicting Risk Factors of Pressure Injury for Perioperative Patients Through Machine Learning With SHapley Additive exPlanations Based on Hospital Information System.

Created on 24 Jun 2026

Authors

Guirong Shi, Xin Xu, Peipei Zhang, Ping Huang, Qingyuan Gong, Ping Liu, Liping Jiang

Published in

Advances in skin & wound care. Jun 25, 2026. Epub Jun 25, 2026.

Abstract

Perioperative pressure injuries (PIs) are a common complication of surgical hospitalization that can lead to serious health problems, compromise wound healing, and cause infections. This study aimed to predict the early risk of PI in perioperative patients by developing an interpretable machine-learning model.
Clinical data of perioperative surgical inpatients in a tertiary hospital in Shanghai from 2017 to 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, covering a total of 14,416 patients for screening. Feature variables were selected using the XGBoost model. Seven machine-learning (ML) models were employed to predict these variables. To evaluate the performance of these prediction models, various metrics such as accuracy, recall, and area under the curve were employed. In addition, a 10-fold cross-validation method was implemented to ensure the generalizability of the models. Furthermore, this study incorporated SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to visualize and elucidate the significance of each factor involved. This study was reported using the TRIPOD checklist.
In the 7 ML models developed, both the Random Forest model and the XGBoost model exhibited exceptional performance. In addition, the study incorporated the SHAP framework to enhance the interpretability of these models. The importance of SHAP variables in the model from high to low were operation duration, age, serum albumin, body mass index, body temperature, and anesthesia grade.
The ML model developed in this study demonstrated strong performance in predicting perioperative PIs. Furthermore, the SHAP method offered valuable insights for interpreting the ML model.

PMID:
42340317
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 24 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement