Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Assessing the Feasibility and Acceptability of Implementing a Preclinic Vital Signs Assessment in Primary Care: Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.

Created on 25 Jun 2026

Authors

John Broughan, Seán McMahon, Steen Gordon, Nandakumar Ravichandran, Donal Bailey, Jennifer Grant, Geoff McCombe, James Sheil, Walter Cullen

Published in

JMIR medical informatics. Volume 14. Pages e72655. Jun 24, 2026. Epub Jun 24, 2026.

Abstract

Vital signs are objective measurements of the body's most basic, essential functions, indicating overall health status. However, such assessments are time-consuming and so are not always prioritized. Measuring vital signs before doctor visits may, therefore, be an effective and efficient strategy.
We piloted a preclinic vital signs assessment (PCVSA) procedure within a primary care center to determine its feasibility and acceptability.
A mixed methods cross-sectional design was used for piloting the PCVSA procedure. Study participants included adult patients and practice staff. Patients had vital signs assessed by a primary care assistant before general practitioner (GP) visits. Collected data concerned participants' study engagement, the timings of PCVSA/GP visits, and surveys/interviews investigating participants' experiences.
A total of 16 patients and 4 staff participated. The mean duration for PCVSAs was 2 minutes and 23 seconds (SD 38.8 s), and the mean duration for GP visits was 9 minutes and 21 seconds (SD 252.4 s). Patients said the PCVSA was a "Positive experience" (n=14, 88%), "Helpful" (n=13, 81%), "Valuable" (n=7, 44%), and "Interesting" (n=6, 38%). The GP said the PCVSAs were either "Helpful" (8/15, 53%) or "Extremely Helpful" (7/15, 47%) in each of their consultations and that the PCVSAs improved engagement with patients (12/15, 80%), allowed them to spend more time gaining an understanding of the conditions of patients (14/15, 93%), and enhanced productivity during consultations (11/15, 73%). The GP strongly agreed that collecting PCVSA data before appointments would benefit patients over time. Qualitative interviews with practice staff yielded three themes: (1) improved patient engagement and efficient consultation, (2) time-saving potential, and (3) practicing in general practice and associated challenges.
The PCVSA pilot showed good feasibility and acceptability as indicated by high participant engagement, short PCVSA and GP visit times (albeit GP visit times did not measure non-patient-facing clinical activity), and positive feedback from patients and staff. Introducing PCVSAs in health care settings may have potential in terms of improving the standard and efficiency of care.

PMID:
42341282
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement