Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Predicting Private Equity Acquisition of Urology Practices by the Social Vulnerability Index.

Created on 25 Jun 2026

Authors

Peyton A Skupin, Danielle Sharbaugh, Michael G Stencel, Sara J Chadwick, Stephen Kisty, Alex Watts, Jonathan G Yabes, Bruce L Jacobs, Benjamin J Davies

Published in

Urology. Jun 24, 2026. Epub Jun 24, 2026.

Abstract

To understand patterns in private equity (PE) acquisition of urology practices based on the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI), a composite, area-level measurement reflecting the following themes: socioeconomic status, household characteristics, racial & ethnic minority status, and housing & transportation type.
We identified PE-owned urology practices by cross-referencing multiple sources. We linked the SVI for census tracts with and surrounding a PE practice (census places). We used multilevel, multivariable logistic regression to predict the probability of PE acquisition for a census tract within a census place based on SVI and its separate themes, adjusted for urban/non-urban designation and physician office density.
We identified 349 census tracts containing at least one PE practice and 11,868 census tracts in the same census places with no PE practices. There was no statistically significant association between the composite SVI measurement and PE acquisition (False Discovery Rate (FDR)-adjusted p=0.390). In exploratory analysis, we found that census tracts with lower socioeconomic status and more racial and ethnic minorities were associated with a significantly lower probability of PE acquisition, although to only a small degree (FDR-adjusted p=0.003 and p=0.002, respectively).
Composite social vulnerability index was not associated with PE acquisition of urology practices.

PMID:
42341947
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement