Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction with Valves Improves Cardiovascular Adaptability and 6-MWT Performance in Severely Limited COPD Patients.

Created on 25 Jun 2026

Authors

Lara Farber, Eva Pappe, Thomas Sgarbossa, Konrad Neumann, Martin Witzenrath, Ralf-Harto Hübner, Jacopo Saccomanno

Published in

International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Volume 21. Pages 592263. Epub Jun 17, 2026.

Abstract

The 6-minute walk test (6-MWT) assesses exercise capacity in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A recent study revealed that selected patients with an advanced emphysema and a baseline walking distance of ≤140 m in 6-MWT benefit from endoscopic lung volume reduction with valves (ELVR) with a remarkable improvement in walking distance. However, the reasons for these improvements remain unexplained.
We retrospectively analyzed 54 patients with severe emphysema undergoing ELVR at Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin. Patients were stratified into 2 groups by baseline walking distance: those with 6-MWT ≤140 m and those with 6-MWT 140-450 m. Changes in lung function, quality of life, and 6-MWT parameters (peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR), and walking distance) were evaluated using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE).
While lung function and quality of life improved comparably in both groups, patients with 6-MWT ≤140 m showed a significantly greater improvement in walking distance versus the 6-MWT 140-450 m group (105.6 ± 123.2 m versus 12.1 ± 80.8 m, p=0.027). GEE analysis indicated that this improvement was accompanied by a significantly greater reduction in ΔHR from baseline to follow-up compared to the 6-MWT 140-450 m group (p=0.023), while changes in SpO2 were similar.
Patients with very limited exercise capacity (≤140 m) improved their walking distance disproportionately after ELVR. The concomitant decrease in HR suggests an associated cardiovascular benefit in this subgroup. Therefore, a 6-MWT of ≤140 m should not be considered an exclusion criterion for ELVR, as these patients can achieve meaningful clinical improvements.

PMID:
42343914
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement