Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Survival Impact of Pathological Residual Patterns for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Created on 25 Jun 2026

Authors

Hidetaka Miyazaki, Mitsuaki Ishida, So Yamaki, Nguyen Thanh Sang, Kazuki Matsumura, Hiroyuki Ishida, Yuki Matsui, Katsunori Uchida, Daisuke Hashimoto, Sohei Satoi

Published in

Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. Jun 25, 2026. Epub Jun 25, 2026.

Abstract

With increasing use of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), accurate pathological response system is essential. Although the College of American Pathologists (CAP) grading is widely used, its prognostic utility remains limited.
This retrospective study included 206 patients with resectable or borderline resectable PDAC who underwent pancreatectomy following NAT. Pathological residual patterns were morphologically classified into three categories-type I (concentric distribution of residual tumor without any surrounding lesions), type II (concentric distribution with surrounding lesions), type III (residual multinodular lesions)-with types I, II grouped as the concentric type, and types III as the multinodular type.
The concentric type had significantly longer median overall survival (OS: 133 vs. 32 months) and disease-free survival (DFS: 32 vs. 18 months) compared with the multinodular type (both p < 0.001). Residual patterns was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR: 2.62, p = 0.017), whereas CAP grading was not (p = 0.142). Residual patterns also provided superior prognostic discrimination, with higher Harrell's C-index for OS than CAP grading (0.711 vs. 0.595; p = 0.047).
Pathological residual patterns may serve as a practical prognostic indicator after NAT.

PMID:
42348279
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 12
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement