Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Five-Year Risk of CIN3+ After CIN1 Biopsy in a Norwegian Screening Setting: Comparison of CIN1 Diagnosed in a Single Calendar Year and in Two Consecutive Calendar Years.

Created on 25 Jun 2026

Authors

Sveinung Wergeland Sørbye, Mona Antonsen, Elin Richardsen

Published in

Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland). Volume 15. Issue 6. Jun 22, 2026. Epub Jun 22, 2026.

Abstract

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 1 (CIN1) is usually managed conservatively, but uncertainty remains about the subsequent risk of clinically significant high-grade disease, particularly after repeated CIN1. We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using anonymized cervical cytology, HPV, and histopathology records from Northern Norway from 2011 to 2025. We described temporal trends in screening-related outcomes and estimated the 5-year risk of CIN3+ after histologically confirmed CIN1 diagnosed in a single calendar year or in two consecutive calendar years. Across 2011-2025, the annual datasets comprised 334,471 screening records; 35,796 had ASC-US+ cytology (10.7%), 29,723 had a positive HPV test (8.9%), 35,416 underwent biopsy (10.6%), and 7870 were diagnosed with CIN2+ (2.4%). HPV positivity increased from 0.9% in 2011 to 15.7% in 2025, whereas CIN2+ detection peaked at 3.1% in 2018 and declined to 1.8% in 2025. In person-based analyses, the 5-year risks after CIN1 diagnosed in a single calendar year versus two consecutive calendar years were 4.3% versus 3.4% for CIN3+, 0.2% versus 0.1% for cervical cancer, and 15.4% versus 14.3% for CIN2+. Repeated CIN1 was not associated with higher subsequent CIN3+ risk, supporting conservative, risk-based follow-up after CIN1 biopsy.

PMID:
42347269
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement