Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Prioritisation of assessments, diagnostic classifications, and outcome measures in Perthes disease: a Delphi survey of international health professionals.

Created on 25 Jun 2026

Authors

Stephanie Ball, Luke M Davies, Kelly Gray, Verity Pacey

Published in

Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery. Volume 146. Issue 1. Jun 25, 2026. Epub Jun 25, 2026.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reach consensus and prioritise the most clinically important assessments, diagnostic classifications, and outcome measures by an international panel of experts for Legg-Calve-Perthes disease.
A three-round modified e-Delphi survey was conducted between April and May 2025. Participants rated the clinical importance of 14 clinical assessments, 26 radiological assessments, eight diagnostic classifications, and 26 outcome measures identified by a scoping review. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement. In the final round, items in each category were prioritised for overall condition and by specific age groups (< 6 years, 6-8 years, > 8 years).
Thirty-eight health professionals, from nine countries participated in round 1. Thirty-four completed all three rounds, a retention rate of 89.5%. Consensus and prioritisation for clinical use were achieved for 10 clinical assessments, three radiological assessments, three diagnostic classifications, and three outcome measures.
Paediatric specialists have reached consensus and prioritised methods to evaluate and diagnose Legg-Calve-Perthes disease in clinical practice. These results represent an important step towards improving continuity of care and the foundation for future development of clinical practice guidelines.

PMID:
42347856
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 25 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement