Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Ageism toward older workers and wellbeing at work: a systematic review.

Created on 26 Jun 2026

Authors

Andy Luis Marrero-Vega, Jesus Yeves, Mariana Bargsted, Sebastián Saéz

Published in

Frontiers in psychology. Volume 17. Pages 1824641. Epub Jun 10, 2026.

Abstract

In the context of unprecedented workforce age diversity, workplace ageism is increasingly reported. This review synthesizes empirical evidence on the relationship between workplace ageism and workplace wellbeing among workers aged 50 and older, focusing on how these effects unfold (mediation) and the conditions under which they are amplified or buffered (moderation).
A systematic literature review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches were conducted in major academic databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed, among others. Of the 3,378 records identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria.
Across studies, ageism showed a consistently negative and statistically significant association with workplace wellbeing outcomes, even though ageism and wellbeing were measured with heterogeneous indicators. Findings also suggest spillover beyond work, for example, via decreases in life satisfaction or subjective wellbeing. Moderation evidence was limited; when tested, social support (supervisor and coworker support) emerged as the only moderator in this association. Mediation evidence was more developed and clustered around three pathways: (1) cognitive processes (e.g., appraisals and rumination); (2) affective processes (e.g., aging anxiety); and (3) job demands-resources mechanisms.
By clarifying these moderators and mechanisms, the review points to leverage points for practices that foster inclusive, intergenerational workplaces and safeguard wellbeing.

PMID:
42359310
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 26 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement