Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Long-term effectiveness and overdiagnosis in the NHS breast screening programme: a cohort study with up to 33 years of follow-up.

Created on 27 Jun 2026

Authors

Amanda Dibden, Dharmishta Parmar, Rhian Gabe, Robert A Smith, Sue M Moss, Louise E Johns, Stephen W Duffy

Published in

British journal of cancer. Jun 26, 2026. Epub Jun 26, 2026.

Abstract

Population-based mammographic screening programmes have been operating for over 30 years and whilst many studies have assessed the short- to medium-term effectiveness of screening, few have assessed their long-term effectiveness. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term effectiveness of the NHS Breast Screening Programme in England and Wales.
2,509,384 women aged 49-64 years and uninvited to screening upon study entry were studied, with screening status changing on invitation and attendance. Women were followed for breast cancer diagnosis and death for a maximum of 33 years. Poisson regression was used to assess the effect of screening on breast cancer incidence and mortality compared to an uninvited comparison group, and overdiagnosis.
After adjustment for confounders, invitation to screening was associated with a 28% reduction in breast cancer mortality (RR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.71-0.74) and attendance at screening was associated with a 33% reduction (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.65-0.69). There was a 4% excess of breast cancer diagnoses associated with being screened (RR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.07) with at least 5 years follow-up post-screening.
These findings indicate that screening continues to be effective in reducing breast cancer mortality many years after cessation of screening and that the level of overdiagnosis associated with long-term follow-up is low.

PMID:
42362870
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 11
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement