Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Exploring the Experiences of Cancer Patients Following an Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia With Professional Phone Guidance: The Sleep-4-All-2.0 Study.

Created on 27 Jun 2026

Authors

Jonathan Journiac, Anne-Laure Sébert, Louise Zanni, Léonor Fasse, Dominique Hernot, Alexandra Monod, Cécile Charles, Jean-Bernard Le Provost, Estelle Guerdoux, Guilhem Paillard-Brunet, Josée Savard, Sarah Dauchy, Diane Boinon

Published in

Psycho-oncology. Volume 35. Issue 7. Pages e70532.

Abstract

Sleep problems affect 30%-95% of cancer patients. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia is recognized as the most effective treatment for insomnia. However, implementing it is challenging due to a lack of time, human resources, and financial support. Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (ICBT-I) is appreciated by patients, but it lacks professional guidance.
The Sleep-4-All-2.0 study combined a validated ICBT-I program, lasting 6-12 weeks, with up to four individual, phone-based ICBT-I psychology sessions. The current study sought to explore patients' experiences of the program, focusing on their perceptions of the professional guidance.
Cancer patients from three different hospitals were interviewed. Out of their discourse, a thematic analysis was conducted.
48 patients were included. Three themes were constructed: (1) Coping with the program, (2) Connections at play (professionals, family, patients, sleep interactions), (3) Benefits and limits of psychological guidance. Although most participants were delighted with the program and the guidance, they encountered numerous difficulties due to personal and external issues, as well as the demands of CBT. Participants highlighted the need to be connected to other patients, supported by their families, and to receive well-informed care from healthcare professionals (HCP). The phone guidance was important for pragmatic and motivational reasons.
In order to improve program follow-up, clinicians should work beforehand to adjust expectations and take into account the specific vulnerabilities of certain patients.

PMID:
42363590
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement