Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Patient-Centred Dental Hygiene Care: Assessing Satisfaction and Quality in Preventive Treatments-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Created on 27 Jun 2026

Authors

Ali Sadiq, Zahra Masood, Hassan Yaqoob, Muhammad Karim, Farhan Raza Khan, Noorin Khan, Hamza Arshad

Published in

JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. Volume 76(Suppl 1). Issue 3. Pages S42-S46.

Abstract

To evaluate patient satisfaction with treatments provided by dental hygienists, and to explore demographic influences on patient perceptions.
The cross-sectional study was conducted from April to June 2018 at Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, and comprised patients having received dental hygiene treatments. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the validated Dental Satisfaction Questionnaire. Data was analysed using SPSS 23.
Of the 83 patients, 51(61.4%) were females and 32(38.6%) were males. The overall mean age was 38.3±14.7 years. All the 83(100%) patients acknowledged respect and carefulness during examinations as well as effective pain management. Accessibility and operational convenience were less favourably rated; 9(8.4%) and 6(7.2%), respectively. Improvements in treatment quality were suggested by 38(45.4%) participants, and 29(34.9%) expressed dissatisfaction with waiting times. Cost-effectiveness was negatively perceived by 40 (39.8%) patients. Age and gender significantly influenced perceptions of care quality, pain management and cost-effectiveness (p<0.01).
The patients generally reported high satisfaction with communication and respect shown by dental hygienists. However, operational factors, like waiting times and treatment quality, required attention.

PMID:
42363376
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement