Deep learning classification of significant prostate cancer on MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors

Christopher Chung, Julia Michalak, Yossef Rubinov, Kara Watts, Devaraju Kanmaniraja, Andrewe Baca, Wei Hou, Tim Duong

Published in

Abdominal radiology (New York). Jun 27, 2026. Epub Jun 27, 2026.

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) image analysis of prostate MRI can be integrated into the prostate cancer diagnostic pathway to improve biopsy decision making, reduce radiologist interpretation time, and decrease inter-reader variability. In this paper, we systematically review the current literature on DL classification of clinically significant prostate cancer detected on magnetic resonance imaging and perform a meta-analysis of reported external validation performance metrics. A literature search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify studies describing end-to-end DL classification models that distinguish clinically significant prostate cancer (defined as Gleason Grade Group ≥ 2) on biparametric or multiparametric MRI. Information on the data sources used for model training and external validation, reference standards, imaging sequences, DL architectures, model inputs, the use of gradient-weighted class activation mapping (GRAD-CAM) or saliency maps, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was extracted. Out of 387 potentially relevant studies, 7 were included in the final meta-analysis. 6 studies were retrospective in design and performed external validation using data from different institutions. One study employed both retrospective and prospective designs, validating the model on the prospective dataset. The pooled patient-level AUC was 0.83 [0.80, 0.86]. While current performance is promising, future research should prioritize prospective clinical trials, standardize reporting measures, and include direct comparisons to experienced radiologists. To ensure the development of widely generalizable models, future studies should evaluate performance on shared, large, and diverse datasets, enabling meaningful cross-study comparisons.

PMID:
42364040
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 27 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.