Sex Differences in the Sleep Architecture and Sleep-Disordered Breathing in C57BL/6 J Mice.

Authors

Dashdulam Davaanyam, Luu V Pham, Huy Pho, Noah R Williams, Vsevolod Y Polotsky, Lenise J Kim

Published in

Sleep. Jun 27, 2026. Epub Jun 27, 2026.

Abstract

Sex differences in sleep disorders have been reported. Sleep disordered-breathing (SDB) is more prevalent in men, whereas women are more prone to insomnia. Mouse models have been extensively used in sleep research, but sex differences are not routinely taken into account. We performed a comprehensive examination of sleep architecture, breathing during sleep, and chemosensitivity in male and female C57BL/6 J mice.
Mice instrumented with EEG/EMG electrodes underwent full-polysomnography inside a whole-body plethysmography chamber. Ventilatory responses to hypoxia (10% O2, 3% CO2) and to two regimens of hypercapnia (8% CO2 balanced in 20.9% O2  vs 8% CO2 balanced in 65% O2) were measured. Female mice underwent bilateral ovariectomy (OVX) and repeated the assessments.
Female mice showed more frequent arousals from sleep, increased apnea frequency and increased respiratory variability compared to males. Hypoxic chemoreflex did not differ between sexes, but CO2 chemosensitivity was significantly augmented in females. The carotid body inactivation by hyperoxia attenuated CO2 chemoreflex responses in females, but not in males. OVX reduced CO2 chemosensitivity, but did not affect respiratory variability, while the apnea index increased.
In C57BL/6 J mice, we found significant sex differences in sleep. Females manifested a more severe SDB phenotype characterized by more frequent arousals and heightened CO2 responsiveness compared to males. Our findings also suggested that more robust peripheral CO2 chemoreflexes may account for sleep disruptions in female mice. Our findings further implicate ovarian hormones in respiratory control.

PMID:
42364162
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.