Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Risk Group Stratification for True Early Recurrence After Ablation for Hepatomas.

Created on 28 Jun 2026

Authors

Yi-Hao Yen, Kwong-Ming Kee, Chao-Hung Hung, Chien-Hung Chen, Tsung-Hui Hu, Jing-Houng Wang, Sheng-Nan Lu

Published in

Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology. Volume 2026. Issue 1. Pages e8778095.

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a lethal cancer. Early recurrence, i.e., recurrence within two years of curative treatment, is a major determinant of ultimate survival.
We included 625 patients with newly diagnosed early-stage HCC, i.e., Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) Stage 0 or A, and Child-Pugh Class A liver disease who underwent percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) between 2011 and 2021 at our institution with a follow-up period of > 2 years. The patients were divided into Group 1 (patients who developed nonlocal recurrence or died within two years after RFA; n = 300 [48.0%]) and Group 2 (patients who developed local recurrence within two years or were recurrence-free and were alive for two years after RFA; n = 325 [52.0%]).
Multivariate analysis showed that a Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score of > 9, anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) positivity, the presence of image-defined cirrhosis, treatment with antiviral therapies for hepatitis B virus or HCV, alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 20 ng/mL, multiple tumors, and larger tumor size were independent factors associated with Group 1. A nomogram was developed based on these variables to predict Group 1, with a concordance index of 68.3% (95% CI = 64.1%-72.5%). The 10-year overall survival of Group 1 was 28%, and that of Group 2 was 64%.
We developed a nomogram to predict true early recurrence (i.e., nonlocal recurrence) of HCC after RFA.

PMID:
42365457
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 28 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement