Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Indirect participant recruitment and representativeness in healthcare workforce research: lessons from a comparative study of the SCOHPICA cohort.

Created on 29 Jun 2026

Authors

Antoine Hennard, Leonard Roth, Chiara Storari, Emilie Zuercher, Jonathan Jubin, Annie Oulevey Bachmann, Ingrid Gilles, Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux

Published in

BMJ open. Volume 16. Issue 6. Pages e110324. Jun 28, 2026. Epub Jun 28, 2026.

Abstract

To assess the representativeness of participants recruited through indirect methods into a cohort of healthcare professionals in the absence of comprehensive and up-to-date national registers.
Comparisons of socio-demographic and socio-professional characteristics from multiple national data sources with those of a large indirectly recruited healthcare workforce cohort.
National healthcare workforce research conducted in Switzerland as a case study, with lessons applicable to other high-income countries lacking comprehensive registers.
Healthcare professionals across 10 professional groups, with data drawn from 14 administrative, institutional, professional and research sources collected between 2016 and 2023, alongside participants from the 2022-2023 baseline recruitment waves of the Swiss Cohort of Healthcare Professionals and Informal Caregivers (SCOHPICA).
Comparisons of age, sex, spoken language, training country, activity rate, working hours and sector of practice across available datasets.
Broad similarities were observed in sex distribution between indirectly recruited participants and external data sources. However, discrepancies emerged in age profiles, linguistic distribution and certain profession-specific variables. These variations reflected both genuine diversity within the population and inconsistencies between available datasets.
SCOHPICA illustrates that in the absence of comprehensive and up-to-date registers, indirect participant recruitment can provide rich, diverse and generally comparable data on healthcare professionals, though representativeness cannot be definitively established. Such investigations offer valuable insights for monitoring and planning healthcare workforces internationally while underscoring the need for improved national registers and standardised workforce indicators.

PMID:
42366004
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement