Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Anode Compatibility of Halide Solid-State Electrolytes.

Created on 29 Jun 2026

Authors

Chunlei Zhao, Yilin Zhang, Fiaz Hussain, Zhepu Shi, Fucheng Ren, Yusheng Zhao, Xueliang Sun, Wei Xia

Published in

Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.). Pages e73862. Jun 29, 2026. Epub Jun 29, 2026.

Abstract

Recently, lithium-metal-halide (Li-M-X) superionic conductors have emerged as promising solid-state electrolyte (SSEs) for all-solid-state lithium batteries (ASSLBs), owing to their high Li+ conductivity, excellent compatibility with cathodes, and good mechanical deformability. However, many of these conductors exhibit chemical and electrochemical instability when in contact with the reductive anodes, which hinders the direct use of lithium metal as anodes with extraordinarily high specific capacities and limits the overall energy density of halide-based ASSLBs. Therefore, enhancing the anode compatibility of halide SSEs has become a critical task in ASSLB development and has attracted broad research interest. Herein, the underlying mechanisms responsible for the instability of halide SSEs against the lithium anode are elucidated based on both experimental observations and theoretical calculations. Recent strategies and progress aimed at improving the compatibility of halide SSEs with lithium anodes are summarized. Moreover, the effects of pressure and volume changes on the interfacial compatibility between halide SSE and lithium metal are discussed. In addition, the current challenges and future research directions are analyzed, aiming to provide theoretical insights and guidance to support further advancements in Li-M-X type solid-state electrolytes and all-solid-state lithium batteries.

PMID:
42371665
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 13
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement