Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Multi-sensor fusion for differentiating swallows between healthy adults and patients with post-stroke dysphagia.

Created on 29 Jun 2026

Authors

Lian Wang, Nannan Cui, Xiaozhen Li, Jia Qiao, Zhenhai Wei, Zulin Dou, Yanxia Liu, Xiaomei Wei

Published in

Digital health. Volume 12. Pages 20552076261465164. Epub Jun 27, 2026.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop a non-invasive method using multi-sensor fusion to discriminate between abnormal swallows in patients with post-stroke dysphagia and normal swallows in healthy individuals.
Acceleration signals, nasal airflow signals, and sound signals were obtained from 108 healthy adults and 108 post-stroke dysphagia patients. Each swallowing signal was segmented according to videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS), followed by features extraction and selection. Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree, K-Nearest Neighbor, Naïve Bayes, and Logistic Regression models were employed to discriminate between normal swallows in healthy individuals and abnormal swallows in post-stroke dysphagia patients.
Overall, classification models utilizing signals from multi-sensor demonstrated superior performance when compared to signals from single-sensor and dual-sensor. Among the five models, the Support Vector Machine model (accuracy: 91.39±3.03%; specificity: 89.53±4.09%; sensitivity: 92.99±2.84%; F1-score: 91.86±2.92%) and Logistic Regression model (accuracy: 91.00±2.71%; specificity: 89.88±3.77%; sensitivity: 91.97±2.70%; F1-score: 91.45±2.55%) have better overall performance for classification.
The multi-sensor fusion has shown promising ability in differentiating swallows in healthy adults from those in patients with post-stroke dysphagia. The findings may provide an important foundation for the use of non-invasive multi-sensor fusion methods to identify dysphagia.

PMID:
42371600
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 29 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 9
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement