Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Frequent Use of Hematologic Testing in Children Admitted for Nonaccidental Trauma.

Created on 30 Jun 2026

Authors

Meghan McCormick, Ramasubramanian Kalpatthi

Published in

Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. Jun 29, 2026. Epub Jun 29, 2026.

Abstract

Nonaccidental trauma (NAT) can present with bleeding symptoms. Judicious use of hematologic testing is recommended to evaluate for medical causes of bleeding, while acknowledging inherited bleeding disorders and NAT may be present concurrently. A retrospective chart review using the Pediatric Health Information System database identified pediatric patients <18 years of age with an ICD diagnostic code for NAT associated with admission. Using laboratory charge data, we identified the hematologic testing sent and the number of encounters with expanded hematologic testing (EHT), defined as testing beyond CBC, PT, PTT, Factor IX, and von Willebrand testing (and fibrinogen/d-dimer in cases of intracranial hemorrhage). In 9561 admissions meeting inclusion criteria, laboratory testing was sent in 91.9% of encounters and EHT in 35.9% of encounters. The most common EHT test being fibrinogen. EHT was associated with a significant increase in laboratory-associated charges. Only 69 children (0.7%) were later identified to have an underlying bleeding disorder, most commonly von Willebrand Disease. Factors associated with EHT included hematology consultation, young age, higher income, and private health insurance. Despite few patients diagnosed with underlying bleeding disorders, EHT was frequently obtained. Sociodemographic features may influence testing decisions. Adherence to guidelines for evaluation may help reduce disparities.

PMID:
42372241
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement