The emergence of human influence on the ozone layer by the 1960s.

Authors

Jian Guan, Benjamin D Santer, Peidong Wang, Qiang Fu, Rolando R Garcia, Yaowei Li, Kane Stone, Douglas E Kinnison, Jun Zhang, Gabriel Chiodo, Jean-Francois Lamarque, Susan Solomon

Published in

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Volume 123. Issue 28. Pages e2608286123. Jul 14, 2026. Epub Jun 29, 2026.

Abstract

The Antarctic ozone hole was first reported in 1985, and small ozone losses at the global scale were also observed in the late 1980s. The combination of field and laboratory measurements, together with modeling, quickly established anthropogenic chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) as the cause of both the Antarctic and global ozone depletion. However, when, where, and why the earliest ozone depletion could have been detected has not been determined. Here, we conduct a thought experiment to investigate when human-induced ozone depletion could have first been detectable, assuming the availability of accurate stratospheric ozone observations from 1950 onward. We find that human-caused ozone depletion was likely identifiable as early as 1957 in the tropical upper stratosphere. This region's low internal variability enables the earliest detection of the anthropogenic signal, even though tropical ozone losses in the upper stratosphere were smaller than those in higher-latitude regions. Our results highlight the key role of considering both internal variability ("noise") and the forced response ("signal") in detection studies. Further, while CFCs are widely recognized as the primary drivers of current ozone depletion, we find that early ozone loss was primarily caused by human-made carbon tetrachloride (CCl₄), used mainly as a solvent. These findings suggest that a clear human influence on the stratospheric ozone layer began nearly 70 y ago, even before substantial emissions of CFCs from spray cans or air conditioning.

PMID:
42372126
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Stats

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.