Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Pelvic alignment and plantar pressure asymmetry in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis: a cross-sectional observational study.

Created on 30 Jun 2026

Authors

Güler Atalay, Osman Söyler, Emre Serdar Atalay

Published in

BMC musculoskeletal disorders. Jun 29, 2026. Epub Jun 29, 2026.

Abstract

Pelvic alignment plays a central role in maintaining postural stability, and asymmetries in pelvic orientation may alter plantar pressure distribution. In adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), compensatory adaptations of the pelvis and lower limbs may contribute to imbalance and asymmetrical weight bearing. The aim of this study is to investigate the association between pelvic torsion, rotation, and tilt with static and dynamic plantar pressure asymmetries in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis.
This study included 60 adolescents with AIS aged 10-18 years. Pelvic parameters were obtained using the DIERS Formetric 4D surface topography system, and static and dynamic plantar pressure distributions were measured with the GaitScan system. Side-to-side differences in forefoot and rearfoot loading were compared using paired t-tests, and correlations between pelvic parameters and plantar pressure asymmetries were analyzed with Spearman's Correlation test (p < 0.05).
Significant plantar pressure differences were found between the convex and concave side of curve. Forefoot loading was lower on the convex side (28.8% vs. 33.9%), whereas rearfoot loading was higher (71.6% vs. 66.6%, exact p = 0.002, effect size r = 0.48). Dynamic loading also favored the convex side (55.4% vs. 45.6%, exact p < 0.001, effect size r = 0.61). Correlations between pelvic torsion, rotation, and tilt with pressure asymmetries were weak and not significant.
Adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis exhibit marked plantar pressure asymmetries, particularly under dynamic conditions.

PMID:
42374345
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement