Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Safety and Effectiveness in 400 Image-Guided Spleen Biopsies from the DeGIR Registry.

Created on 30 Jun 2026

Authors

R Ocker-Serger, M Opitz, L Klüner, M Drews, D Rosok, L Salhoefer, M Forsting, J Haubold, B M Schaarschmidt, S Zensen

Published in

Cardiovascular and interventional radiology. Jun 29, 2026. Epub Jun 29, 2026.

Abstract

To evaluate technical success, diagnostic yield, and complication rates of image-guided percutaneous splenic biopsies based on multicenter registry data from the German Society for Interventional Radiology and Minimally Invasive Therapy.
This retrospective multicenter study analyzed image-guided percutaneous splenic biopsies documented in the prospective DeGIR registry between 2018 and 2024. Technical success was defined as needle placement within the target lesion. Diagnostic yield was defined as histologically adequate samples enabling clinical diagnosis.
Four hundred splenic biopsies from 92 centers were included. Technical success was achieved in 99.00% of procedures. The complication rate was 5.00%, including 2.50% major complications with no procedure-related deaths. Complication rates were higher for procedures performed under local anesthesia than analgesic sedation (p = 0.042). Histopathological reports were available for 338 procedures, resulting in a diagnostic yield of 90.83%. Diagnostic yield increased with the number of biopsy samples, reaching a maximum with three samples. Procedures performed under analgesic sedation showed a higher diagnostic yield than those under local anesthesia (p = 0.019).
Image-guided percutaneous splenic biopsy is a safe and effective diagnostic procedure with high technical success and diagnostic yield. Analgesic sedation and obtaining up to three biopsy samples may improve diagnostic performance without increasing complication rates.

PMID:
42373898
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 6
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement