Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Mendelian randomization study on related factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus].

Created on 30 Jun 2026

Authors

Y R Zhang, X T Yang, Y Zhong, X R Yang, M Lyu

Published in

Zhonghua liu xing bing xue za zhi = Zhonghua liuxingbingxue zazhi. Volume 47. Issue 6. Pages 1151-1157. Jun 10, 2026.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the causal associations between 47 potential risk factors and the risks of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) using Mendelian randomization (MR). Methods: Genome-wide association study summary statistics for 47 exposures, as well as for BE and EAC, were included. The causal associations were evaluated using the random-effects inverse variance weighted method. Horizontal pleiotropy was assessed using MR-Egger and MR-PRESSO methods. The Benjamini-Hochberg method was applied for multiple testing correction. Results: The MR analysis showed that waist-to-hip ratio, body fat percentage, trunk fat mass, trunk fat percentage, whole-body fat mass, and never smoking were causally associated with the risk of BE (adjusted P<0.05). Body mass index, waist circumference, hip circumference, body fat percentage, trunk fat mass, trunk fat percentage, whole-body fat mass, basal metabolic rate, duration of regular smoking, educational attainment (college or above), and years of education were causally associated with the risk of EAC (adjusted P<0.05). Conclusions: Genetically predicted obesity-related traits and never smoking were causally associated with the risk of BE. Obesity-related traits, basal metabolic rate, duration of regular smoking, educational attainment (college or above), and years of education were causally associated with the risk of EAC.

PMID:
42373495
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 10
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement