Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Real-World Adult Height Outcomes in Girls with Central Precocious Puberty Receiving GnRHa Monotherapy or Combined with Growth Hormone: A Cohort Study in China.

Created on 30 Jun 2026

Authors

Fei Wang, Yan Li, Yu Yang, Wei Gu, Xuan Xu, Haiying Wu, Guimei Li, Xiaoqin Yin, Shasha Zhou, Pin Li

Published in

Advances in therapy. Jun 30, 2026. Epub Jun 30, 2026.

Abstract

Although gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa) are the standard treatment for central precocious puberty (CPP), the efficacy of GnRHa monotherapy in older children (around 8 years) and that of combination therapy with recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) both remain unclear. This study aims to evaluate the real-world efficacy of each regimen.
This retrospective cohort study enrolled Chinese girls with CPP. Two groups were formed: GnRHa monotherapy and GnRHa + rhGH combination therapy. Outcomes included adult height gain [AHG, final adult height (FAH) standard deviation score (SDS)- predicted adult height (PAH) SDS],genetic height gain [GHG, FAH SDS-target height (Tht) SDS], and change in height (FAH SDS - baseline height SDS).
In the GnRHa group, the mean age at treatment initiation was 8.87 ± 0.87 years. After 17.87 months of treatment, the AHG was 1.33 SDS (0.82, 2.00). In the GnRHa + rhGH group, the mean age at treatment initiation was 9.01 ± 0.80 years. After 23.02 months of GnRHa treatment and 14.02 months of rhGH treatment, the group showed significantly greater AHG [1.72 SDS (1.24, 2.59)].
GnRHa monotherapy initiated after age 8 may still provide meaningful height gains, and adding rhGH is associated with improved FAH in patients with severe baseline height impairment.

PMID:
42377737
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 30 Jun 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement