Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

[Immunoglobulin G4-related retroperitoneal fibrosis: clinical, laboratory, imaging, and histopathological features in a Russian single-center cohort].

Created on 01 Jul 2026

Authors

A S Veretennikov, A V Torgashina, B D Chaltsev, A M Kovrigina, J I Khvan, D A Dibrov

Published in

Terapevticheskii arkhiv. Volume 98. Issue 5. Pages 306-313. Jun 13, 2026. Epub Jun 13, 2026.

Abstract

To describe a Russian cohort of patients with IgG4-related retroperitoneal fibrosis (RPF).
This retrospective single-center study included 36 patients diagnosed with IgG4-related RPF according to the revised 2020 diagnostic criteria. Clinical, laboratory, instrumental, and pathomorphological data were analyzed.
The cohort of 36 patients with IgG4-related RPF predominantly comprised males (4:1 ratio), with a median onset age of 52 years and median time to diagnosis of 8 months. The disease most presented with low back or lower abdominal pain (75%), renal dysfunction (44%), elevated serum IgG4>1.35 g/L (82%), and increased ESR/CRP. Urinary tract infection was detected in 44% due to frequent ureteral catheterization. Isolated retroperitoneal involvement occurred in 72% of cases, with typical infrarenal periaortitis in 58%; atypical sites included perirenal, periureteral, and presacral localizations. Biopsy (n=23) revealed lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate (100%), fibrosis (87%), IgG4+/CD138+>40% (71%), with obliterative phlebitis (26%) and tissue eosinophilia (26%) less common.
Compared to international data, our findings reveal a higher prevalence of atypical localizations and concomitant urinary tract infections, necessitating their consideration in diagnostic algorithms and treatment planning for RPF patients.

PMID:
42378523
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 2
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement