Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Visual functioning in patients with macular degeneration compared to patients with cataracts.

Created on 01 Jul 2026

Authors

Reilley M Knott, Nathan Grove, Jennifer L Patnaik, Niranjan Manoharan, Anne M Lynch, Karen L Christopher

Published in

International journal of ophthalmology. Volume 19. Issue 7. Pages 1278-1283. Epub Jul 18, 2026.

Abstract

To compare Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (VFQ) response data in patients with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) to patients with cataracts.
In total 415 individuals with early or intermediate AMD and 236 patients with visually significant cataracts who completed the VFQ-25 from a single academic eye center registry between July 2014 and May 2022 were identified. The effect of disease (AMD versus cataract) on VFQ composite score was analyzed using univariate and multivariable linear regression, controlling for age, race/ethnicity, history of transient ischemic attack (TIA)/stroke, and visual acuity.
AMD patients were older than the cataract group (76.0±7.4y vs 73.2±5.9y, P<0.001). There was no difference in sex between groups with both being predominantly female (63% for AMD vs 61% for cataracts, P=0.801). The VFQ composite score was higher in the AMD group (88.8±10.7 vs 82.8±14.5, P<0.001). All vision-related and socio-emotional subscales had significantly higher scores among AMD compared to cataract patients. When adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, history of TIA/stroke, better-eye visual acuity, and worse-eye visual acuity, patients with cataracts had a 3.3-point lower VFQ composite score (95%CI: -5.3 to -1.4, P<0.001) compared to patients with AMD.
Patients with early or intermediate AMD report higher visual functioning compared to patients with cataracts in composite score and all VFQ subscale categories in both unadjusted and adjusted analyses.

PMID:
42382961
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 7
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement