Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Clinical impact of Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutation status on recurrence patterns and the efficacy of local therapy after hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.

Created on 01 Jul 2026

Authors

Kosuke Kanemitsu, Hiromitsu Hayashi, Yoshiyuki Tagayasu, Takumi Tanizaki, Yuki Adachi, Takashi Ofuchi, Takuya Tajiri, Yuki Kitano, Hirohisa Okabe, Masaaki Iwatsuki

Published in

Surgery today. Jul 01, 2026. Epub Jul 01, 2026.

Abstract

The Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is defined as frequently mutated oncogenes in colorectal cancer. We aimed to clarify the clinical impact of KRAS mutation status on recurrence patterns, the surgical management of recurrent lesions, and prognostic outcomes after curative hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).
The subjects of this retrospective study were 190 patients who underwent curative (macroscopic R0 resection) hepatectomy for CRLM and had wild-type (62.1%) or mutant (37.9%) KRAS status.
KRAS mutations were associated with significantly worse overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well as more aggressive recurrence patterns. Multivariate analysis identified KRAS mutation as an independent predictor of poor OS and RFS, whereas CEA ≥ 5 ng/mL was independently associated with OS but not RFS. Notably, patients from the mutant KRAS and wild-type KRAS groups who underwent local therapy (as repeat resection or ablation) for local recurrence had comparable OS. Conversely, among the patients who did not receive local therapy, those from the mutant KRAS group had significantly worse OS than those from the wild-type KRAS group.
KRAS mutations are associated with aggressive recurrence patterns and a poor prognosis for patients with CRLM. However, survival following local therapy for recurrence appeared less pronounced regardless of KRAS status.

PMID:
42384210
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 01 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 3
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement