Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Haploinsufficiency of PITX2 in Four Chinese Families with Axenfeld-Rieger Syndrome.

Created on 02 Jul 2026

Authors

Chumou Liu, Zhou Zhou, Li Xu, Guo Liu, Nanxin Liu, Li Hu, Junkai Tan, Zijie Chen, Mahri Hommodova, Ning Fan, Jiaoyue Hu, Xuyang Liu

Published in

Journal of glaucoma. Jun 12, 2026. Epub Jun 12, 2026.

Abstract

Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome (ARS) is a rare genetic disorder characterized by anterior segment dysgenesis and secondary glaucoma, often accompanied by systemic defects. This study investigated the clinical and genetic features in four Chinese families with ARS.
To characterize the clinical phenotypes and identify the causative genetic mutations in four unrelated Chinese families with ARS.
Affected individuals from four Han Chinese families underwent comprehensive clinical and ophthalmological examinations. Genetic analysis was performed using whole-exome sequencing (WES) and validated by copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) and qPCR.
All affected individuals exhibited anterior segment dysgenesis. Secondary glaucoma was present in seven of them. Systemic manifestations, including dental and umbilical abnormalities, were observed in all affected individuals. Genetic analysis identified novel heterozygous PITX2 mutations in all four families: three distinct microdeletions (ranging from 206 bp to 449.97 kb) and one nonsense mutation (p.Phe140*) , with all predicted to cause haploinsufficiency.
Four novel PITX2 mutations, including microdeletions, were identified in Chinese ARS families. The 206-bp genomic DNA deletion appeared to be an essential region (chr4: 111543411-111543616) for PITX2 function in ocular and systemic development, underscoring the necessity of full gene dosage.

PMID:
42384866
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 4
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement