Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Perceived physical activity barriers in university students: associations with fatigue and eating behaviours.

Created on 02 Jul 2026

Authors

Mustafa Akil, Mehmet Emre Eryücel

Published in

Scientific reports. Jul 01, 2026. Epub Jul 01, 2026.

Abstract

Physical inactivity is prevalent among university students, and psychosocial factors shape participation patterns. This study examined the concurrent and independent associations between fatigue, appetite-related eating behaviours, and perceived barriers to physical activity. A total of 666 students aged 18-24 participated in this cross-sectional study. Data were collected using the Chalder Fatigue Scale, the University Students' Eating Behaviour Scale, and the Barriers to Physical Activity Participation Scale. Analyses included Pearson correlations, multiple linear regression, and bootstrapped indirect association analyses. Fatigue was positively associated with perceived barriers (r = .336, p < .01). Both physical and mental fatigue were positively associated with personal and social barriers (β = 0.136-0.227), while mental fatigue was associated with environmental barriers (β = 0.195). Eating behaviours, particularly satiety responsiveness (β = 0.142-0.235) and hunger (β = 0.110-0.157), showed independent positive associations with barrier domains; slowness in eating was associated only with personal barriers (β = 0.087). Bootstrapped analyses indicated small but statistically significant indirect association patterns. Fatigue and appetite-related eating behaviours are modest but consistent correlates of perceived physical activity barriers. These findings should be interpreted as cross-sectional associations rather than causal or directional mechanisms.

PMID:
42387156
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 1
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement