Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Delayed splenic rupture following video-assisted thoracoscopic left upper lobectomy: a case report and literature review.

Created on 02 Jul 2026

Authors

Wei Li, Huawen Hu, Zhuang Cheng, Erping Xi

Published in

Frontiers in surgery. Volume 13. Pages 1853919. Epub Jun 17, 2026.

Abstract

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is the preferred surgical approach for early-stage lung cancer, though it can rarely cause life-threatening delayed splenic rupture (DSR). With an insidious latent course, DSR frequently eludes early diagnosis and may progress to fatal hemorrhagic shock. We herein describe a 70-year-old male with a prior subtotal gastrectomy who developed DSR on postoperative day 6 after VATS left upper lobectomy. The patient presented with acute hypotension and tachycardia without overt abdominal signs, was confirmed via bedside ultrasonography (US) and diagnostic peritoneal paracentesis (DPP), and recovered uneventfully after emergency splenectomy. A pooled analysis of nine cases revealed that VATS-related DSR predominantly complicates left-sided thoracic surgery, manifesting as hemodynamic instability and progressive hematological decline with subtle abdominal findings, which commonly leads to early misdiagnosis. Major etiologies include intraoperative transdiaphragmatic injury and postoperative diaphragmatic traction aggravated by abdominal adhesions. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) remains the diagnostic gold standard for stable patients, while bedside US and DPP enable prompt emergency diagnosis. Individualized management is tailored to hemodynamic status and splenic injury severity. Meticulous intraoperative technique, rigorous postoperative monitoring, and high clinical vigilance, particularly for patients with abdominal adhesions, are critical to prevent DSR, reduce diagnostic delay, and optimize surgical outcomes.

PMID:
42389368
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 5
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement