Hiring in life sciences? Share your open positions with our professional community. Read more Close

Advertisement

Comparative analysis of the postoperative effectiveness of different splenic artery aneurysm embolization techniques.

Created on 02 Jul 2026

Authors

Biao Wu, Liang Chen, Xiaonan Wang, Hao Zhang, Jiang Zhu, Kangjie Chai, Liangxi Yuan

Published in

Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine. Volume 13. Pages 1726290. Epub Jun 17, 2026.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the postoperative effectiveness of different embolization techniques for splenic artery aneurysms(SAAs), i.e., sandwich technique and mushroom technique, by analyzing data from our single center.
Between January 2019 and December 2023, a total of 220 patients with SAAs underwent embolization (sandwich technique n = 102, mushroom technique n = 118). Outcomes assessed included technical success, procedure time, length of hospital stay, total hospital costs, 30-day mortality, incidence of post-embolization syndrome(PES), splenic infarction rate, and aneurysm recanalization rate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for PES in patients with splenic artery aneurysms after surgery. Normograms were used to predict the likelihood of developing PES after surgery.
The technical success rate of both embolization techniques was 100%, and the 30-day mortality, splenic infarction rate, and aneurysm recanalization rate were all 0. However, the mushroom technique was associated with less procedure time, length of hospital stay, total hospitalization costs, and incidence of PES than the sandwich technique. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the number of aneurysms as well as the embolization method were independent risk factors for PES.
The mushroom technique achieves the same favorable short-term prognosis of the sandwich technique and results in a relative reduction in operative time, length of hospital stay, total hospital costs, and incidence of PES.

PMID:
42389629
Bibliographic data and abstract were imported from PubMed on 02 Jul 2026.

Read full publication at:
Please sign in to see all details.

Advertisement

Stats

  • Community rating n/a 0 votes
  • Reviewers' rating n/a 0 votes
  • Your rating

1-terrible, 9-excellent. How would you rate this publication? Sign in in to submit your rating.

  • Recommendations n/a n/a positive of 0 vote(s)
  • Views 8
  • Comments 0

Recommended by

  • No recommendations yet.

Post a comment

You need to be signed in to post comments. You can sign in here.

Comments

There are no comments yet.

Advertisement